Cedric Worthingham, 

Assistant to the Director,

 UN Secretariat

I do disagree with you about putting the money into development instead of health.  Andrew T. Price-Smith made a marvelous study of the impact of diseases on state capacity.  He showed that the higher the damage of disease, the greater the impact on the capacity of the state to handle it--about a 9 year deleterious impact.  Declining state capacity negatively affected health for only about 4 years.  

Price-Smith suggested a negative spiral:  disease causes lowered state capacity, and the lowered capacity then makes coping with diseases worse, and the diseases then lower state capacity further.  Unless we can do something to cope with diseases--HIV, malaria, dengue, TB--African states may collapse.  Paving highways, buying buses, increasing electricity  aren't going to help as much as dealing with health issues.  (See  Health of Nations, MIT Press 2002.)

One of the problems we have to find a way to work around is the liberal philosophic position of the United States.  The US supports human rights, but defines those rights in strictly political terms:  voting, elections, competition for office, turnover.   Their view is narrow and individualist. 

Most Americans  have a knee-jerk reaction against "socialized medicine."  Remember, Ronald Reagan even cut the public health program, on the grounds that he didn't want government doctors competing against private physicians.    The US will only support prevention and development.  

European countries, and the rest of the world, adopted a communitarian view, with emphasis on social rights.  All members of the community, because of the membership, should have shelter, food, clothes, education, health care.  Citizen identities are "thick" unlike the thin, legalistic identities of liberalism.  

 When the Europeans helped eliminate US representation on the UN Human Rights Commission, they were making it possible for the UN to promote  a broad health care program in Africa.   We'll  have to target pharmaceutical firms and  NGOs,  not the US.     You will have to include more on prevention--there will never be enough drugs to treat everyone;  prevention  will help in the long run.  Use the US funds for prevention.   

   

Riasat Hussein Ali, 

Deputy to the UNAID Director, United Nations

 

Sassou Mjibola

Deputy Director, African Regional Office World Health Organization 

 

Kwezi Osangan,

 Assistant to the Deputy Secretary, United Nations Secretariat

 

Lin Bao Chin

Assistant to the Secretary-General of the UN

Dr. Sucheta Varma,

Assistant to the Deputy, World Health Organization